WITHQUIZ

The Withington Pub Quiz League

QUIZBIZ

2nd June 2004

Home

WQ Fixtures, Results & Table

WQ Teams

WQ Archive Comments Question papers

Results & Match Reports

.....and so to the final games of the season with only next week's gala evening at the Albert Club before we pack up our papers for the summer - but what a good way to end...

VAL DRAPER CUP FINAL:

Fifth Finger beat Brains of Oak in a real thriller at the Griffin getting home by the narrowest of margins thanks to Barry getting a 2 on the last question.  Well done to both teams for a night to remember.

Here are the views from either side courtesy of Kieran and Gerry (Fr M).

Kieran writes:

Cracking game, lead changed at least four times and it needed Barry to get a two
on the last question to win it.  Thankfully he eventually remembered to add Bolton
to the list of north west premiership clubs and the victory was ours.  Barry also scored the two of the night, possibly the season, by correctly guessing that Emile Heskey's middle name was Ivanhoe.  Fantastic stuff!!  That certainly was question of the week and possibly of the year.

 As always with the Brains it was a good evening, played in a great spirit and very close all the way through.  Mike Heale kindly volunteered to QM and so there was no lip from either team!

Gerry writes:

So, for the second year running, an enthralling, nip-and-tuck final brings the season to a close. This time it was the valiant Finger V who nipped it right at the wire with the gallant Brains tucked in just behind them.  After the game, a breathlessly beer-sodden, yet stoically philosophical Fr. Megson admitted to feeling well and truly tucked.

"Truly a finish to end all finishes and the starter was quite yummy as well", he waxed.

"Going into the final 2 questions there were still 14 teams in contention and I cannot remember this ever happening in a Cup Final before especially since we originally had fewer than 14 teams entering the competition.  Any ideas, Fr. Donely ??

"I must admit I put my last fiver on Crystal Palace but in the end even they couldn't halt Kieran's lot.  I have always said there is a fine line between being clever and being stupid and at the end of the day the Brains only managed to stay on the stupid side by the narrowest of margins.  I feel confident that, under my expert tutelage, we can significantly increase this margin next season.  Sorry, gotta dash.  I'm doing some research into local occasions of sin and I don't want to miss the climax".

Some excellent questions and just about the right level of hardness for a Final.  What did the Plate Finalists think?  (see below, Ed)  If I must quibble (and as usual, I must), there were a few ill-considered pairings that brought tears to our eyes.  We felt that the excellent, thought-provoking Tyre connection question deserved a more frisky bedfellow than the rather obvious and flaccidly lethargic Orange connection one proffered.  Also, Meryl Streep herself confirmed at the post match interview that Out Of Africa did indeed win Best Picture Oscar in 1985 as ventured by the Brains, not Amadeus which romped home at the 1984 awards.  But what the heck, garçon, take these sour grapes back to the bar and replenish our pots with the Chateau Holts 2004 with its mature yet reassuringly cheapo little bouquet redolent of pork scratchings.  Let's all join in and congratulate Finger V for their magnificent Double achievement in what has been an excellent season for all our teams with the possible exception of Manchester City.

Gary and Mike, have you worked out yet who we play in next season's Cup Final?

And finally ........................................as FR. M's old kindergarten chum Reggie Bosanquet used to say before invariably losing his biscuits over the weatherman's shoes...........

QUESTION OF THE SEASON: The award this year goes to a seasoned chestnut but one that never fails to put Sister Roisin in an even more mellow mood.  So let's hear it for:

"Do any of you sad losers want a drink?"

PLATE FINAL:

Ethel Rodin beat History Men in a somewhat one-sided match at the Red.  It seems Ivor had chosen to leave his team in the lurch and go away on holiday.  Well I ask you!!!  I can't see Victoria telling David he can't go to Portugal just 'cos she's booked to take the nippers to Florida, can you?

Anyway here is the view from the victorious Ethel camp (courtesy of Roz):

Well!  Despite everything, Ethel Rodin finally got her revenge over the History Men in the final of this year's Plate, after having been beaten by them in the Plate final last year!  We triumphed 35-23.  Luckily Ivor was away on holiday in Amsterdam with his family (half term).  His team missed him - especially in the first 5 rounds.

None of us were greatly enamoured with the paper; there were some errors and one very 'iffy' question (more later).

 
At the end of Round 1, Ethel led 7-0 (if the date for the international match at the Valley on 30th May had been correct - it was actually played on 31st May - the score would have been 9-0!).  Round 2 was a disaster for both teams, ending 11-0 to Ethel Rodin.  By this time, the History Men were beginning to wonder whether they would be the first team ever to score 'nil points'!
 
In Round 3, the Historians finally broke their duck with a 2-pointer.  There was a great deal of controversy over the question on who composed the Magnificat and the Easter Oratario.  Several composers had, in fact, composed works with at least one of these titles.  The score at the end of that round was 16-2.
 
Controversy hit us again in Round 4.  Although the History Men, after consultation got 'cross pean' correct, they queried the spelling of 'pean' (according to my dictionary, it can be spelt 'peen', 'pein', or even 'pane', but not 'pean').  And I believe it was Verdi not Puccini who wrote Force of Destiny.  Although Roddy sang the tune, Ethel Rodin had no idea what the answer was!  An inspired guess at Ivanhoe (Emile Heskey's middle name) by Ethel, gave them a bonus point.  At the end of that round, the score was 20 - 5.  Mixed fortunes in Round 5, ending with the score at 25-7.
 
In Round 6, History Men played a blinder, scoring three 2s, a 1 and a bonus, against Ethel's two 1s; score 27-15.  In Round 7, John Mellor queried the more common name for Fireweed, saying that there was a Canadian Fireweed, which is very small, but he finally plumped for Rose Bay Willowherb.  Both teams made reasonable scores with the round ending 32-19 to Ethel.
 
In Round 8 there was controversy over whether it was, in fact, Brian Hanrahan who famously said 'I counted them all out and I counted them all back again', but, by this point Ethel's victory was in the bag and the History Men most graciously conceded defeat.
 
Thus the final score was 35-23.  It was a terrific fight-back by History Men, but too late.
 
Looking forward to seeing you all on Wednesday, 9 June at Albert Park.  I have been assured that Ivor will bring 'The Plate' with him so that it can be presented to Ethel Rodin.  Perhaps our change of name this season brought us 'Good Luck'; perhaps we will have better luck next year if we change it again!

Quiz Paper Verdict

The setters for the final week of the season were the Albert.  They opted for a traditional paired question format with no themes or pictures.  It was tough but there were plenty of juicy bits of trivia to be had (such as the QOTW below).  The main thing is that it provided the basis for a truly memorable Cup Final - and judging from the comments above it seems everybody greatly enjoyed the challenge.

The average aggregate score this week was 65.5.

The Question of the Week

My 'Question of the Week' award goes to Round 4 Q7:

What links the footballer Emile Heskey to a novel by Sir Walter Scott?

(to see the answer to this and all the other questions click here)

Chatterbox

Thursdays et al

Over the past few weeks, as we approach our summer break, Opsimaths' post match chit chats have involved some exchange of views on how we run things (as well as the usual 'What shall we call ourselves next year?'  argument).  I suspect other teams have had similar chats.

I think it a good idea if 15/30 minutes at the start of the end of season do at the Albert Club on June 9th are devoted to representatives of each team discussing matters of mutual interest (including the Wednesday/Thursday topic dealt with in the feedback remarks below). 

The 2 big Opsimath proposals for change are: a) to start the season earlier (say mid September) and thus finish earlier (say early May) and b) to revert to more conventional Cup/Plate competitions which last no more than 4 weeks and allow the teams knocked out in the first round of the Cup a chance to dominate the Plate competition without being swamped by the big guns who get knocked out of the Cup in later rounds.  In other words the Plate should be (as far as is possible) exclusively for the lesser teams.

Below is the feedback received so far this season in the Wednesday evening/Thursday evening issue:

Feedback 1:

St Caths and X-Pats discussed this issue after their recent match and were firmly in favour of sticking to Wednesdays.

Feedback 2:

Copland has come back saying that Stumped also vote strongly against switching to Thursdays.

Feedback 3:

Mary O'Brien (Albert) favours keeping to Wednesday - at least until we've had a chance to debate the issue again at this season's gala night.

Feedback 4:

Ethel Rodin are finding Wednesdays at the Red Lion almost impossible to negotiate, what with wide- screens and football at every turn.  They would favour moving to Thursdays.

Feedback 5:

On balance the Fingers wish to stick with Wednesdays.