WITHQUIZ

The Withington Pub Quiz League

QUIZBIZ

25th November 2009

Home

WQ Fixtures, Results & Table

WQ Teams

WQ Archive Comments Question papers

SPW and the Opsimaths carry on unbeaten - the Charas win the mid-table battle over

the History Men

Results & Match Reports

Electric Pigs officially started their season at the Fletcher Moss with a welcome first victory against the Bards of Didsbury - Gary writes:

"No idea if this was good enough to take us off the bottom of the table but I must report the season proper started here for the Pigs with our first win and league points in a 29-28 thriller at the Moss vs the Bards.  The thrill being not so much the securing of said points and win but the nature of it.  Behind for the entire game and pretty much resigned (truth be told) to another winless week (as distinct from pointless, which quiz nights NEVER are, of course) and still 4 points in arrears entering the last round, the Pigs went ahead for the first and last time with their last-gasp bonus-point clincher from the Lottery question.  1994 - our number, at long last this season, had come up."

Charabancs of Fire scored a notable victory over the History Men at the Swan - Ivor writes:

"Another mid-table clash (how the mighty are fallen compared with a few years ago) and for us there was no way back having fallen ten behind after only two rounds"

Opsimaths and Ethel Rodin fought a tense affair at the Albert Club with the score swinging heavily towards Ethel in Rounds1 and 8 but sufficiently the other way in Rounds 2 to 7 to ensure an Opsimaths victory

SPW played away from home at the Albert Club (presumably the Griffin is being redecorated ready for the visit of the Opsimaths in a fortnight) but still managed a convincing victory in the Club's Table Tennis room against the Prodigals

Quiz Paper Verdict

This week the paper was compiled by Albert.

A wide range of subjects were covered from pop singers who went to war to the introduction of the poll tax in 1275.  In between some home town themed rounds evenly balanced between City and United (why doesn't Bolton Wanderers ever get a look in?).  I particularly liked the Alphabet Soup Round 6 since Mount Godwin-Austen fell to me and Ethel's John had already mentioned K2 earlier in the Round.  If I was to raise one criticism I felt starting the quiz with a trick question about Grand Nationals in the First World War was a misjudgement.

In the City-themed Round 7 I struggled for ages with Cassandra eventually dredging up the name 'William Connor' (but I have no recollection of City substitute Dave Connor).  After the match Roddy helped me remember the Daily Mirror's Cassandra's famous diatribe against Liberace:

"He is the summit of sex - the pinnacle of masculine, feminine, and neuter.  Everything that he, she and it can ever want.  I spoke to sad but kindly men on this newspaper who have met every celebrity coming from America for the past 30 years. They say that this deadly, winking, sniggering, snuggling, chromium-plated, scent-impregnated, luminous, quivering, giggling, fruit-flavoured, mincing, ice-covered heap of mother love has had the biggest reception and impact on London since Charlie Chaplin arrived at the same station, Waterloo, on September 12,1921.

This appalling man - and I use the word appalling in no other than its true sense of terrifying - has hit this country in a way that is as violent as Churchill receiving the cheers on V-E Day.

He reeks with emetic language that can only make grown men long for a quiet corner, an aspidistra, a handkerchief, and the old heave-ho.  Without doubt, he is the biggest sentimental vomit of all time. Slobbering over his mother, winking at his brother, and counting the cash at every second, this superb piece of calculating candy-floss has an answer for every situation.

There must be something wrong with us that our teenagers longing for sex and our middle aged matrons fed up with sex alike should fall for such a sugary mountain of jingling claptrap wrapped up in such a preposterous clown".

Eat your heart out Fr M this is true full frontal invective.  Liberace famously sued and won damages.

Ivor's report from the Swan echoes the feeling that the balance of hard and easy in the paper wasn't quite fair to the team going second:

"It was not a night for inspired guesses.  Rupert (making his first appearance of the season for us) guessed the Betty Hutton film of a girl who gets into trouble was called Blanche De-Flowered which actually sounds more likely than the The Miracle of Morgan’s Creek.  And surely the pencil dress H-line should have been HB line?  One would also have hoped that the inventor of the electric chair was an electrician but I suppose being a dentist he already had the chair.

Talking points?  Perhaps the questions were a bit unbalanced  in the first half - and wasn’t Gillian Shepherd in the Major cabinet?  Our QotW vote went to the one about the poll tax."

And finally Gary reports in from the Fletcher Moss:

"A couple of comments about what we thought was an okay paper (personally, I thought pretty good, but my enthusiasm was not shared by all my fellow Pigs).  It started off alarmingly in question 1.  There may be no trick questions in Millionaire (as Chris Tarrant is all too eager to remind us).  There SHOULD (equally) be none in our league.  Surely any question which asks for the number "none" is perilously close to one.  Anyway, that aside, the subject of the 2 themes was interesting, poignant and of pleasing local relevance.  Raises again, for me, however, the old chestnut that I have still not heard satisfactorily answered: why (oh, why) do teams, having gone to the trouble of creating an ingenious theme, not keep it hidden?  Surely, cracking the code is half the fun, isn't it?  Occasionally, I must admit, the unintended consequence of such spoon-feeding makes the questions just too damn easy.  As QM in the first half, I made the executive decision to withhold the theme's identity.  Both teams had cracked it by the end of the round, so on the evidence of OUR game at least, it wasn't SO difficult that it needed spelling out beforehand.

QotW?  I'll make an executive decision for the Pigs on that one as well.  I have drunk far too many celebratory pints since to do it proper justice but any question with innuendo around the word banana usually gets my vote."

The Question of the Week

This week the History Men voted for Round 8 Question 8:

The poll tax of 1275 led to the widespread introduction of what in England?

For the answer to this and all the week's questions click here.

Ten Years of the WithQuiz website

This is now the tenth season in which the Withington Quiz League has been supported by this website.  The earliest reference I can find on the site is to an article I wrote for the South Manchester Reporter which was published on November 28th 1999 and then copied onto the website sometime later.  So I guess this week is as good a time as any to write about the first 10 years of the site.

Back in 1999 it seemed to me from what I knew about the web that it offered exactly the sort of facility that could support and enhance our Wednesday quizzing activity so I set about registering withquiz.org.uk and playing around with software trying to find out what I needed to do.  Then (as now) I chose Microsoft’s Frontpage to engineer the site (I had acquired a free copy).  It's a fairly basic package but quite adequate for our needs.  By the start of the 2000/01 season I was just about ready to put something up on a site each week.  Of course at first I was just ‘talking to myself' but gradually the word spread and the website took off.  I think I was right in judging that the site would enhance our quizzing hobby though it took quite a while to persuade everybody of this.  But even Mike Heale (so I was told) had taken to consulting the website before he packed up quizzing (and, sadly, everything else).

Essentially the site combines 3 elements: 1) information about the competition in which we are engaged to help participants know what’s going on, 2) commentary from some of the participants on the matches, the question papers, the venues, Sean the barman at the Swan, Jitka’s latest malapropism, or whatever, and 3) an archive of all the questions we have asked each other over the past 10 years.  In terms of time taken by me to upload this material, the information element takes a few minutes (providing you all send me the results promptly – which you invariably do these days), the commentary takes an hour or so of editing (though of course all depends on you the correspondents and what you decide to send in at midnight on a Wednesday) and the question paper usually takes 2 to 2.5 hours to get loaded up just right.  It’s all a labour of love for me.  By which I mean I enjoy doing it and am chuffed at what I think has been the success of the endeavour.  We now have over 17,000 questions (and, of course, answers) on the site and get visited on average about 48 times a day.  The site has helped attract new teams and new players.

So who have been the heroes of the website’s first 10 years?

  • ·      The weekly correspondents (usually Ivor, Damian, Kieran, Mary, Tony, Roddy, Gary, Dave and Clive) who get home from the pub at approaching midnight on a Wednesday and, rather than cuddle up to their loved ones, sit down at the computer and send me an email detailing how it was for them that evening.

  • ·       Father Megson (aka Gerry Collins) who has added a whole new dimension to the commentary aspect of the site.  I did hear from Dave Rainford a year or so ago that his TV quizzing acquaintances often mentioned our website, and Fr Megson in particular, as a regular read for the national quizzing fraternity

  • ·      Gerry Hennessy who, IMHO, continues to devise the best quiz papers of them all (I am looking forward to the Dummy papers later this season – Gerry has agreed to set both of them for us)

  • ·      John Dennison who nobly stepped into the breach when I went off to Oz to watch the cricket and kept the website show on the road for a couple of months.  I have no intention of giving up my webmaster role just yet though John’s trial run means I do now have some back up

My favourite website week?  Well there have been a number of weeks when the Megson column winged its way to my computer from deep inside some local Post Office and left me laughing out loud, but the best week by far was the one a few years ago when the airwaves went blue with limericks to commemorate Roisin’s  Shannon gaffe.  Great fun!

Anyway enough of the nostalgia.  I’m looking forward to this being the first season during the life of the website that SPW/Napier Girls/Griffin Braggarts/etc/etc do NOT win the league title.

Brave words indeed.

MIKE

Fr Megson

A Less Than Glorious Mystery Shop

Dusty is in Rome this week campaigning for the canonisation of the Manchester Martyrs and her late Auntie Maureen who once had a visitation of ecstasy whilst kneeling in front of a statue of St Martin de Porres.

Still no definite sightings of Fr Megson though the private detective that I recently retained - I refuse to call him a dick because I find the word rather vulgar - seems convinced that he is still operating in the Salford diocese.  As part of his investigation he has gone through all the Mystery Shopper reports arising from visits to confession boxes in the diocese over the past three months.  A mammoth task to be sure but by concentrating on visits that scored 5% or less he has narrowed the field considerably.  One report in particular, conducted in the less salubrious end of Miles Platting, seems to indicate the Megson modus operandi.  The actual report is still with the vice squad but here is a synopsis:

Saturday Nov 7th 2009: Entered confessional at 18:58 in the guise of a penitent sinner. Was kept waiting in the dark for 11 minutes as priest was still engaged with lady in the other box.  He seemed to become agitated when she refused to follow his instructions.  The lady was sobbing and did not seem comforted by his reassurances that it was dark and that nobody would know.  Following her departure there was a further substantial delay and the sound of muted swearing and the clinking of ice cubes could be heard.

At 19:16 the slat on my box was (aggressively) opened.  No name badge was visible on the priest and his vestments seemed to be in disarray.  No eye conduct or friendly greeting was given other than to ask if I had a light. 

In accordance with my brief I commenced to ask the father to bless me and to tell him it was a week since my last confession.

He professed no personal interest in this statement and told me to stop "fecking around" and tell him if I had been fornicating or looking at any good porn recently. When I denied any such behaviour on the grounds that I was a good catholic, he expressed his disappointment in a very vehement manner and said that we would have to make do with my dirty thoughts.

When I started to explain how once I had been tempted to entertain feelings of anger towards my next door neighbour who occasionally allowed her cat to do a whoopsie in the middle of my rhododendrons he called me a "lily-livered fecking Sassenach bible-basher" and further advised me that I should "feck off before he started to lose his temper ".

I politely reminded him that he had not as yet given me absolution or a requisite number of Hail Marys to say whereupon he leapt out of the box and proceeded to eject me from the church in a demeaning and excruciating manner.

I have not been back to work since this visit and I am now strongly considering becoming a practising Buddhist. 

TOTAL SCORE FOR VISIT = Minus 5%.

(I have to say that I was told to upgrade my original score considerably as the Chief Executive Officer of my company, JOYFUL MYSTERY SHOPPING LOGISTIC SOLUTIONS, plays golf with the Bishop of Salford).