| 
			 WITHQUIZ The Withington Pub Quiz League QUIZBIZ 11th October 2017  | 
			
			 
			  | 
			||||
| WQ Archive | Comments | Question papers | |||
| 
							 Wins for the Dunkers, the Shrimps, the History Men and the Opsimaths on another high-scoring evening  | 
						
| 
							 The Results  | 
						
| 
							 
							
							
							 "Two games in, points on the board, 88 scored and a negative points difference. 'What's that about?' as a massively irritating millennial would say. Barry the blurt continued his eventful start to the season. Last week it was his two gifts to Albert that was the difference between the sides (admittedly balanced by 6 twos and a clear win as MVP out of all the eight players). This week, at a particularly tense point in the game, he blurted all over Judy Murray (you're never going to be able to unsee that are you?) with the Wightman rather than the Federation Cup. But then at the start of the last round, and with the Donutz desperately needing a two, he screwed his courage to the sticking place and, reminiscent of Psycho against Spain, rammed home Chesterfield's impressive church to give us the lead. We stayed ahead until the end - just - and in truth neither Barry nor the west London sparks ever needed redemption. It's a white knuckle ride playing for the Dunkers this season though. Come to think of it, it was pretty much the same last time around. We 
							were outscored 16 to 11 on twos but last week we 
							scored 19 maximums, including a run of eight 
							consecutively, and still lost.  Conferred 
							answers and especially bonuses are priceless it 
							seems.  Next week we're in the sometime Swan and no doubt with another thriller. It's good to be back." 
 Compulsory Mantis Shrimp emerged from the evening as table toppers with their second consecutive victory - this time over Ethel Rodin. Rachael sends these comments.... "After a very enjoyable evening we finished 3 points up. The paper inspired plenty of frantic conferring on both sides but we all enjoyed it even though it took a lot longer to finish than last week's offering. Another great evening!" 
 The Bards of Didsbury started well then faded losing to The History Men at the Cricket Club. Ivor sends his victory paean.... "It was a game of two halves tonight with the Bards racing to a 6 point lead by the mid-point interval. Usually we lose focus when we're adrift but not tonight; we'd levelled the scores by the end of Round 6. Then came the two bingo rounds. Tony is not keen on the element of luck involved in bingo rounds as opposed to a setter's attempts at precision pairing (not that that always works anyway). Tonight once again the Bards selected with less luck than their opponents. 
							 ....and from the losing side of the wicket Mike H contributes these views.... "Definitely a game of two halves with the History Men storming back after the break. Great fun QMing with Dom. I really enjoy reading the questions, and would be happy to QM for any team needing a QM over the coming season. Oh, and by the way, The History Men expressed some concern that their season is starting with three away matches (although their home ground is definitely not in the process of refurbishment). They feared that they might 'do a West Ham'. They needn't have worried!" 
 
							
							The Opsimaths got the better 
							of Albert on Round One (the pop lyrics round) and 
							just kept the advantage right through to the end.  
							Pop lyrics are not central to the Albert ethos so 
							there was much huffing and puffing from the Albert 
							Club's visitors when, as QM, I announced the first 
							theme.  Indeed the solitary Albert score on 
							this round was a two from punk Steve for knowing 
							about Gary Gilmour's eyes. 
							As ever with Albert it was 
							good-humoured and somewhat fatalistic.  
							Witchdoctor-in-chief, Mike, had brought his mojos 
							(too numerous these days to list) in a plastic bag 
							but forgot to get them out until well into the quiz.  
							When he did there was a slight improvement in 
							Albert's score rate - but, sadly for them, not 
							enough to catch up with the Opsis. 
							The home team were blessed with another flying visit 
							from Paddy Duffy who this time was on his way back 
							to London after recording all the new series of 
							RBQ programmes up in Scotland (they will be 
							broadcast from late November onwards).  Of 
							course he was unable to tell us how his Northern 
							Ireland team got on - or indeed try out any of the 
							questions on us - but he certainly perked up when 
							the connections 
							So a very satisfactory start to the season for the 
							Opsimaths who sit out next week and look forward to 
							the real possibility of being bottom of the league 
							table with a 100% record! 
							Mike O'B sends his thoughts on the evening's 
							match.... 
							"The quiz set by the Charas (damn 
							their black Chara hearts!) would have suited us 
							better if we had lost the toss and gone second.  
							We were behind early on and never caught up.  
							The total score, however, suggests that overall the 
							paper was fair enough.  Our favourite question 
							concerned Hartlepool.  We don't hear enough 
							about Hartlepool.  In fact there should be more 
							Hartlepoolcentric questions - and indeed whole 
							rounds.  The Albert team has solemnly dedicated 
							itself to furthering this noble enterprise - so look 
							out for entire quizzes devoted to this North Eastern 
							settlement. We say if its good enough for the Ven. 
							Bede its good enough for us!"  | 
						
| 
							 The Paper  | 
						
| 
							 
							
							
							 Another high-scoring quiz with an average aggregate just shy of 80 points. Greatly enjoyed by all (judging from the feedback) and little to complain about (though The Bards expressed their traditional concern over the unfairness of bingo rounds). If I remember rightly there were 8 unanswered questions in the Opsimaths/Albert match which is about par for the course, but crucially they broke 4 each. Favourite round? Well most of you seemed to enjoy the craft that went into the Bingo rounds at the end of the evening. Not just well-judged questions but plenty of quirky information on the side that delighted all. I suspect the light touch of the ironically brutal cleric was much in evidence here. Venerable Bede's 'stags watering-hole' question was the QotW choice of both Albert Club teams who worked out the answer from the material in the question text. When they did there was an audible 'penny drop' sigh from both sides of the room. Since the question went to Albert, however, it was they who earned the points. Comments from other matches? Kieran.... 
							"A very good Charas paper produced a very good 
							contest with our visitors still able to earn a draw 
							right up the last question (if only they'd known 
							their Mansfield from their Newark).  Much post-match 
							debate as to how on earth there could be an eyesore 
							in Mansfield.  We rather liked the fact that 
							Queen Victoria was the only queen regnant to give 
							birth to a king who succeeded her (none has given 
							birth to Ivor.... "The stats show that it was a very well-balanced paper with only four unanswered questions and a combined score of 80 (slightly easier than some past Chara papers). There were 20 twos scored which is rather fewer than were gained in last week’s pointsfest. Incidentally Greg from Ethel Rodin got a perfect 8 twos last week playing against us. These are almost as rare as 147s in snooker so a belated congratulations to him. A paper full of interesting questions. The song titles almost did for us. Can there be a worse start than a question on pop music to Tim with the very first question of the night? There seemed to be a large number of questions where answers were successfully dredged up from the deepest archives of memory - so deep that I cannot recall ever laying down the memory in the first place; Stamford Raffles and Kidderminster Harriers for example. These are always more satisfying than knowing the answer before the question is finished." Rachael... "It was a very good paper with lots of varied and interesting questions on a number of themes." ...and so say all of us.  | 
						
| 
							 The Dave Barras 'Question of the Week'  | 
						
| 
							
							 
 
 For the answer to these and all the week's other questions click here. | 
						
| 
							 Setters v Sitters  | 
						
| 
							 The Charas and The Pigs got close to arranging a match this week but it fell through late in the day. So no S v S this time round.  |