Albert beat History Men
Albert re-leapfrog their Historical rivals to regain the second place slot
Mike
and his team mates bask in their new status of 'superbeings'
A very traditional paper, reliant on old favourites such as the paired round, but none the worse for that. It also contained a fresh approach to the Run-ons though it would seem to be a formidable problem to recreate a whole round using this approach. The lead changed hands several times indicating a good quiz but Round 6 threw the result Albert's way. There was a lengthy discussion trying to construct the line of succession between Henry VIII and George V - very tenuous.
At the end Ivor made a strange comment along the lines of "Holy Mother of God how can we oppose these quizzing superbeings?" though on reflection I may have misheard him.

A Taoiseach between two roses
(R1/Q1)
Ivor
anticipates a late season down amongst the Opsimaths
It was too good to last. And so it begins ... our gradual decline down the table. Actually gradual might be wishful thinking looking at the chasing pack (Ethel, CKC and the Bards) all of whom smarting from early season humiliation, and like wasps only dazed from a good smack, are now very angry and poised to hit back hard. But it is a funny old world is quizzing and you never can tell. Never make predictions, especially about the future.
Apart from losing the evening passed like many other encounters with the Albert in the oasis of calm that is the Sun in September. Same old faces (for both teams): Eveline, Ashton, Jeremy in his red corduroys (it was either those or the mustard coloured ones), and the strangely named Julienne. Indeed Julienne offered our Anne £5 if she could spell all three of his names correctly. I have forgotten what they are already but perhaps others might like to take on this Rumpelstiltskin- like challenge.
Going first, and despite a blurt on the very first question (I am sure there will be an Irish PM some day called Kelly), we found ourselves two points ahead by the end of Round 5. Sadly (for us, not for the Albert) Round 6 ended 1-8 and there was no recovery. The paper was very balanced - 4 unanswereds each, with Albert outscoring us in twos (7-8) and steals (4-6). The combined score of 71 was rather poor compared with other games. Perhaps both our ageing sides are just running out of knowledge. We did try. MOBO in the QM seat did find us trying at times but being impartial in the chair there was no Paddle of Rebuke for either team.

Eve's baby
(R2/Q5)
Opsimaths lost to Ethel Rodin
Ethel continue their recovery moving up to fourth place
Mike
describes a trying evening at the Albert Club
I don't always agree with Kieran but his recent criticisms of the Albert Club as a quizzing venue were amply borne out this week. Noise from a City match, frequent visits to the kitchen by the bar staff, a particularly noisy bunch of drinkers right next to the divide into the back lounge (what divide I hear you say) and these were the least of the problems for our QM, Brian. Add to that a paper full of lengthy questions and plenty of points to dispute then you have the recipe for a long and trying evening.
Both teams did try and it was pretty even pegging until the last couple of rounds when Ethel sped away into the distance to victory by 9 points.

Where Europe meets Africa
(R5/Q8)
It was great to have Emma back on the Opsis team and with Hilary we were at last able to claim sex equality once more (Howell and I representing the blokes). Greg, James, Rob and Michael were the Ethels in the room. Not surprisingly there was a fair bit of political reflecting going on throughout the evening and once we'd done with the paper the opinions burst forth. Ethel were as ever very sporting and the whole match was played in an excellent spirit as we jointly tackled the challenges of the environment, the paper and the Carlsberg.
James
is perpendicular in Gloucester as he writes
A lot could be said about Brian’s QMing but it could be summarised by saying that it left the players of both teams feeling somewhat emotional and tired by the end of the evening. Several of the subtleties of some excellent questions were not given full justice. I think both teams lost a few points as a result.
The 'Animal sounds' round was very clever, and some of the answers far from obvious. Purr-pendicular was particularly excellent (in fact I write to you today from the tea rooms at Gloucester Cathedral on my way to Cardiff). I was not so impressed with Baa-kshire (Question 8: name the one county which fits this theme).
I remember my Dad always used to watch that program with James Bolam in (Round 7, Question 3) and so out of the blue I suggested it as a total guess, purely based on the dates. I'd never actually watched it.
The quiz was neck and neck apart from Round 7 which we won 9-1 - and the margin of victory was that 8 points.


Freshly
exorcised Michael bears reliable witness
Damian
deposits a couple of stools but to no avail





